![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj7D3IeSXs_nxzhQDvA1PfVSQ69QgMaQwIwA_xeolmNYL_STszd1IxJRiHVLiN8hp7bqVuNdNGVkYMXfyH2_-P6bTz052BvLWYxVkWfNkpbxkm2d5tg1tCWhUunKr1J_9HIobN9L3T0DX4S/s400/darwin.logo.medium.gif)
Rules
So how are the Darwin Awards actually determined?
Nominees significantly improve the gene pool by eliminating themselves from the human race in an obviously stupid way. They are self-selected examples of the dangers inherent in a lack of common sense, and all human races, cultures, and socioeconomic groups are eligible to compete. Actual winners must meet the following criteria:
Reproduction
Out of the gene pool: dead or sterile.
Excellence
Astounding misapplication of judgment.
Self-Selection
Cause one's own demise.
Maturity
Capable of sound judgment.
Veracity
The event must be true.
Not a Darwin (but not safe either)
* Whizzing on an electric wire
* Smoking in an oxygen tent
* Being hit by a train or automobile
* Aerosol cans, etc., in the oven
* Climbing into zoo cages
* Falling off precipice while posing or pissing
* Carbon monoxide poisoning
* Most autoerotic deaths
* all too common!
Killing others: The death of innocent bystanders absolutely rules out a Darwin Award. We don't applaud those who take others out of the gene pool, even if they share some DNA in common.
No comments:
Post a Comment